<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: A Vampyre Story (PC)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:32:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>MH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>I would not pay for a sequil, this game should have gone all the way through. It was short, and easy. The grafics may count, but for the money this game was a rip off. I&#039;m sorry but it should have been a real game. A full game. I&#039;m sorry I was dumb enough to buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not pay for a sequil, this game should have gone all the way through. It was short, and easy. The grafics may count, but for the money this game was a rip off. I&#8217;m sorry but it should have been a real game. A full game. I&#8217;m sorry I was dumb enough to buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokk</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 03:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>Comment to the &quot;Mona moves exceptionally slow&quot; in the review.

If you point your mouse cursor to the next &quot;scene&quot; (ore room). You get a red arrow, then just click the right mouse button. 

Then you skip Mona walking sloooooooowly across the screen. :)

Regards 
Mokk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment to the &#8220;Mona moves exceptionally slow&#8221; in the review.</p>
<p>If you point your mouse cursor to the next &#8220;scene&#8221; (ore room). You get a red arrow, then just click the right mouse button. </p>
<p>Then you skip Mona walking sloooooooowly across the screen. :)</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Mokk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haggis</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks for clarifying. I do hope that AME (and Crimson Cow) learn from this, and they can be thankful that the average gamer didn&#039;t really notice.

I do want to say that I liked your review overall, and I&#039;ll be adding this site&#039;s feed to my Google Reader. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks for clarifying. I do hope that AME (and Crimson Cow) learn from this, and they can be thankful that the average gamer didn&#8217;t really notice.</p>
<p>I do want to say that I liked your review overall, and I&#8217;ll be adding this site&#8217;s feed to my Google Reader. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lucard</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lucard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>Oh, I completely agree the third act was cut for time and money reasons - nothing nefarious. I didn&#039;t mean to imply that. As I said in my review, I don&#039;t know the reason. All I know is that Autumn Moon was still mentioning the third act to reviewers and their publishers up until the game&#039;s release in PR blurbs, and then it wasn&#039;t there. So when I&#039;m looking at a press release that came with my review copy mentioning three acts and there&#039;s only two in my game...well that affects my review. 

Of course, I actually referred to AVS as &quot;A Three Act Adventure Game&quot; with Bill(Thanks for catching the typo in the review at the top. No one else did) in my interview with him on 11/21 and he never corrected me on that which I also find strange in retrospect.

In the end it is bad communication by Autumn Moon where they never bothered to correct that statement and at times kept promoting and mentioning the third act up until release. 

I still really loved the story of the game, but when 33% of the game is missing, it leaves me cold ala Soul Reaver.

As for Adventuring gaming community, I mean those of us that are professional reviewers. Contrary to popular belief, people from different gaming sites do talk to each other, especially about niche genre games. In this case it was mainly emails going around saying &quot;Did you get an unfinished copy of AVS? Did your game cut out the third act or is it just mine? The game says 15 hours of play - where is the rest of it?&quot; and so on. 

I think the average gamer was unaware of the missing content but after the Rhapsody DS incident from Nippon Ichi earlier this year, we&#039;re all a little paranoid about publishers/developers telling us one thing and then it not being in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I completely agree the third act was cut for time and money reasons &#8211; nothing nefarious. I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that. As I said in my review, I don&#8217;t know the reason. All I know is that Autumn Moon was still mentioning the third act to reviewers and their publishers up until the game&#8217;s release in PR blurbs, and then it wasn&#8217;t there. So when I&#8217;m looking at a press release that came with my review copy mentioning three acts and there&#8217;s only two in my game&#8230;well that affects my review. </p>
<p>Of course, I actually referred to AVS as &#8220;A Three Act Adventure Game&#8221; with Bill(Thanks for catching the typo in the review at the top. No one else did) in my interview with him on 11/21 and he never corrected me on that which I also find strange in retrospect.</p>
<p>In the end it is bad communication by Autumn Moon where they never bothered to correct that statement and at times kept promoting and mentioning the third act up until release. </p>
<p>I still really loved the story of the game, but when 33% of the game is missing, it leaves me cold ala Soul Reaver.</p>
<p>As for Adventuring gaming community, I mean those of us that are professional reviewers. Contrary to popular belief, people from different gaming sites do talk to each other, especially about niche genre games. In this case it was mainly emails going around saying &#8220;Did you get an unfinished copy of AVS? Did your game cut out the third act or is it just mine? The game says 15 hours of play &#8211; where is the rest of it?&#8221; and so on. </p>
<p>I think the average gamer was unaware of the missing content but after the Rhapsody DS incident from Nippon Ichi earlier this year, we&#8217;re all a little paranoid about publishers/developers telling us one thing and then it not being in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haggis</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>Crikey, you&#039;re right.

It would seem though that all the references to the &quot;three chapters&quot; all originate at that AME blog post, which seems to be a very unfortunate mistake on the part of Dave Harris. In his enthusiasm he shared a little too much, it seems. What I do know is that AME was working hard on the game right until the end, and they just barely got it out after it being delayed several times, so I really don&#039;t think they cut the third chapter on purpose - they were just out of time (and money perhaps).

And when you say &quot;adventure gaming community&quot;, which one do you mean? :) Adventure game fans are pretty much scattered around everywhere, and they&#039;re part of different online communities. As for the ones I know (mostly LucasArts adventure fans), I&#039;ve seen disappointments with the abrupt ending, but no complaints about the third act being cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey, you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>It would seem though that all the references to the &#8220;three chapters&#8221; all originate at that AME blog post, which seems to be a very unfortunate mistake on the part of Dave Harris. In his enthusiasm he shared a little too much, it seems. What I do know is that AME was working hard on the game right until the end, and they just barely got it out after it being delayed several times, so I really don&#8217;t think they cut the third chapter on purpose &#8211; they were just out of time (and money perhaps).</p>
<p>And when you say &#8220;adventure gaming community&#8221;, which one do you mean? :) Adventure game fans are pretty much scattered around everywhere, and they&#8217;re part of different online communities. As for the ones I know (mostly LucasArts adventure fans), I&#8217;ve seen disappointments with the abrupt ending, but no complaints about the third act being cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lucard</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4397</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lucard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4397</guid>
		<description>How about the actual web site of Autmn Moon Entertainment itself from 10/27/2006

http://amegames.com/blog.asp

&quot;The game is going to be divided into three chapters, with a succinct set of goals for each area. Chapter One takes place in the Castle Warg, Chapter Two in the fictional town of Vlad&#039;s Landing, and Chapter Three takes place in and around the castle of Dr. Riga Mortis. Chapter Three will also give you the opportunity to play the game as Froderick the Bat, Mona&#039;s smart-ass sidekick (you actually have to play as Froderick during Chapter 3 because Mona is….shall we say…indisposed).&quot;

Note that the game ends right when chapter 3 of game one is supposed to begin. 

There&#039;s also press releases, news clips, wikipedia and more. 

Everything about the game has come out and say &quot;One game - three chapters.&quot; Then less than a year ago it changed to &quot;Two games with the second taking place after the three chapter game.&quot; Now it&#039;s a trilogy which is a pretty new development aka backpeddling.  

Everyone of us in the Adventure gaming community was a bit gobsmacked by this as the third act of the game had been mentioned even up until release date. Then in the actual game, it was gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the actual web site of Autmn Moon Entertainment itself from 10/27/2006</p>
<p><a href="http://amegames.com/blog.asp" rel="nofollow">http://amegames.com/blog.asp</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The game is going to be divided into three chapters, with a succinct set of goals for each area. Chapter One takes place in the Castle Warg, Chapter Two in the fictional town of Vlad&#8217;s Landing, and Chapter Three takes place in and around the castle of Dr. Riga Mortis. Chapter Three will also give you the opportunity to play the game as Froderick the Bat, Mona&#8217;s smart-ass sidekick (you actually have to play as Froderick during Chapter 3 because Mona is….shall we say…indisposed).&#8221;</p>
<p>Note that the game ends right when chapter 3 of game one is supposed to begin. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also press releases, news clips, wikipedia and more. </p>
<p>Everything about the game has come out and say &#8220;One game &#8211; three chapters.&#8221; Then less than a year ago it changed to &#8220;Two games with the second taking place after the three chapter game.&#8221; Now it&#8217;s a trilogy which is a pretty new development aka backpeddling.  </p>
<p>Everyone of us in the Adventure gaming community was a bit gobsmacked by this as the third act of the game had been mentioned even up until release date. Then in the actual game, it was gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haggis</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4396</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4396</guid>
		<description>Do you have any links to sites that say that? I&#039;ve followed the news surrounding AVS pretty fanatically, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever read that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any links to sites that say that? I&#8217;ve followed the news surrounding AVS pretty fanatically, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lucard</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lucard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>Considering all the original press from the past few years mentiones the game would be a single game with three acts and the first two acts show up in the game and it ends right when the third was supposed to start, it&#039;s pretty obvious what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering all the original press from the past few years mentiones the game would be a single game with three acts and the first two acts show up in the game and it ends right when the third was supposed to start, it&#8217;s pretty obvious what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haggis</title>
		<link>http://diehardgamefan.com/2008/12/11/review-a-vampyre-story-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-4386</link>
		<dc:creator>Haggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diehardgamefan.com/?p=81084#comment-4386</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure where the idea comes from that there was a third act in this game that&#039;s been cut. Bill Tiller (not Ben ;) has always made it pretty clear that he wanted AVS to be a trilogy, akin to LOTR. Granted, the ending does leave the player hanging a bit, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s because they just took a game and cut it in two. If anything, the point at which they ended the story of AVS 1 could have been better chosen, but knowing AME, they wouldn&#039;t pull a fast one just to make more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure where the idea comes from that there was a third act in this game that&#8217;s been cut. Bill Tiller (not Ben ;) has always made it pretty clear that he wanted AVS to be a trilogy, akin to LOTR. Granted, the ending does leave the player hanging a bit, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s because they just took a game and cut it in two. If anything, the point at which they ended the story of AVS 1 could have been better chosen, but knowing AME, they wouldn&#8217;t pull a fast one just to make more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
